Why is “Climategate” Getting Little to no Coverage?
November 27th, 2009 | Author: Alexander Nobles
In 2008 Dr. Roy Spencer wrote a book entitled “Climate Confusion: How Global Warming Hysteria Leads to Bad Science, Pandering Politicians and Misguided Policies that Hurt the Poor
Why is “climategate” getting little to no coverage? It is all about the money. There is so much money to be made on account of the fear caused from global warming, just ask Al Gore. The more fear, the greater the reward, for congress, for anybody. Newscasters NEED apocalyptic stories to survive. It gives them this story they can add to here or there, whenever they need something to talk about. The people who are promoting global warming just want to but fear and guilt into the American people, and business. Fear produces money, and rushed legislation. How many scientists are funded due to the need to figure out why this “warming” is happening, or the need to figure out how to combat this “warming.”
Global Warming… is Dead. Soon to Follow: Mainstream Media
Subscribe to our Twitter page!
50 Responses to “Why is “Climategate” Getting Little to no Coverage?”
Leave a Reply
- Republicans Poised For Big Gains
- It’s not your father’s NASA anymore
- Deflation Cometh
- The Patsy Generation: How The Government Sticks It To The Young
- Arizona Immigration Law [Cartoon]
- Meet Jan Brewer, a bright new face in the GOP crowd
- Some Answers For Progressive Conservatives
- Five Reasons Home Prices May Slump For Years
- Economy Turning A New Corner [Cartoon]
- Iran To Take Russia’s Leftover Nukes [Cartoon]
http://www.infowars.com/climategate-the-silence-is-deafening-from-the-corporate-media/
By now most of us in the alternative media are aware of the some 61 megabytes of global warming research data of emails, documents, and computer code released by whistleblowers (or hackers), that have exposed climate scientists, at the University of East Anglia in Great Britain, as the frauds they’ve proven themselves to be.
This decade of emails and documents clearly concludes that global warming scientists have manipulated scientific data to “hide the decline” in global temperatures; and the fact that, there has been no statistically significant global warming for fifteen years, but our world has experienced a rapid and significant cooling for nine years.
So breath-taking has been this leaked data, to date, it has produced some startling headlines in the alternative media!
Now, these global warming scientists, who have been so severely exposed for the frauds they are, are crying, “Persecution!”. While their own emails prove they have been very busy planning how best to get tenured professors fired, who will not shallow the rotten fish of anthropogenic global warming, how to black-ball them from scientific journals, and prevent them from participating in the peer-review process.
Persecution? No, prosecution in a criminal court of law is what they deserve.
Even Obama’s Climate Czar, John P. Holdren has been exposed, by these emails, for the fraud he is, proving Holdren’s avid global warming advocacy has been more driven by politics than science.
http://www.infowars.com/climategate-the-silence-is-deafening-from-the-corporate-media/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VebOTc-7shU
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Climategate and the Sellout of America
If you haven’t read or heard about the “Climategate” scandal, you should have. The Climate
Research Unit (CRU) in East Anglia, England had their email server hacked and several hundred
of their emails have been released publicly. None of these bode well for the CRU and their
“manipulation” of the data used to prove “Climate Change” is being caused by “man-made
sources”. They also reveal a very unscientific manner in refusing Freedom of Information
requests, deleting data, forging and “tricking” data, and overtaking peer review journals that
have dissenting editors reviewing their work. No one in the CRU is denying their authenticity.
To take raw data, “trick” it into making it support your hypothesis isn’t science. Refusing peer
review of your data sets (raw), analysis of your computer programs that generate the models,
and refusing FOI requests is simply very bad science and obtuse at best. To expect any
government body, specifically the IPCC arm of the United Nations, to rely on your “research”
in developing legislation or policy is absurd in light of these emails.
Here are the facts regarding the CRU:
American taxpayers have been funding the CRU in England for years through various grants
directly and through the NOAA.
The U.N.’s IPCC has been relying heavily on their “research” to develop the Kyoto and
Copenhagen Climate Change treaties.
The House and Senate version of the Cap and Trade bills are heavily relying on the CRU’s
“science” in assuming man-made global warming exists.
Under the Kyoto and the Copenhagen accords, highly industrial nations are going to be
required to literally TAX energy. Our scheme in Congress requires the purchase of carbon
credits to offset excessive emissions of CO2 over and above the “Cap” you are allotted.
These “credits” are going to be a new form of “security” that will be sold like stocks and
bonds and will be available to the highest bidder if a companies initial allotment of these
carbon credits exceeds their needs. Alternative and renewable energy sources are
exempt, but any carbon based fuels used to generate electricity, fuels to run our vehicles,
or industries that use carbon based fuels to manufacture products (ie. Steel) will be forced
to buy credits over and above their “cap” of CO2. Because these “credits” are traded on
the open market, the Goldman-Sachs, the G.E.’s, and others engaged in the trading of
Carbon Credits will generate unbelievable profits. YOUR energy costs will rise as well.
Electricity and gasoline prices will skyrocket. Prices for ALL goods transported by any
means will rise as well due to increase in transportation costs. It is estimated that 1.9
million jobs will be shed as well as many factories and industries will simply shut down
due to these increased energy costs. The Copenhagen Treaty will assure that our nation,
with our existing industries, will pay into the IMF (through initial carbon-credit allocation
purchases) and will finance the growth of third world economies by assuring them they
can have industries and factories that will allow them to “catch up” to the rest of the world.
These low to no interest “loans” will come from the IMF as well as from investments by the
Investment Bankers (Goldman-Sachs to name one), the G.E.’s, and any OTHER companies
who are now located in the United States and need a good “excuse” to move even more
American jobs to developing nations.
ALL of this is being done with YOUR tax dollars. Consider that these utilities, manufacturers,
and oil companies that will pay for these “carbon credits”, will pass their costs directly to YOU
in the form of higher prices. As more and more of our energy consuming industries move
to these “developing nations”, our economic growth base declines. Energy needs WILL be
reduced in America and production of energy sources in developing nations explodes-
economically and in quantity. Since they are NOT subject to “cap and trade” schemes, the
cost of doing business in these countries is so much less, it means OUR industries are moved
overseas and we are left with virtually none. Simply look at the number of factories moved to
China, Mexico, and Indonesia since the NAFTA treaty and you get the idea of what America
is going to look like in a few short years.
Why, you ask is this information not being seen on our tv’s every evening so we Americans can
be informed about what is the best avenue for our government to take? Oh, I guess you don’t
know yet? CNN, NBS, CBS, ABC, and MSNBC apparently have decided that they know
what is better for America than the people do. So they will feed you the news that is best for
you.
As the walls of Rome are smoking, the circus presents more subjects to the crowd.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Amazing piece of information , not to mention i barely found it after searching for hours on the internet thanks.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
You prepared a number fine points there. I did a good solid research for this particular issue and found out generally people will definitely agree with your website. Thanks
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Good idea
awesome post – i’m creating video about it and i will post it to youtube !
if you wana to help or just need a link send me email !
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Where abouts are you from? can’t tell from your use of english if its UK English or American English!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Ferdinand looks like he’s lost some pace, not the same player as a few years ago
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
This is perfectinformation for me to forward to new clients, heck even existing clients. i likeall of them. Thank you for your doon this article!
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
latest wii ISO coming very soon served on a plate for you, latist best site welcome to best russia site join the fun at games iso
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
Good list! Blog commenting is an excellent way to get valuable inbound links.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0